JEs Journal is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the standards of review. Once the paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be single-blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. JEs Journal review guidelines are listed below: Step 1: Editorial assessment Peer review follows a number of stages, beginning with submitting article to a journal. At this first stage, the journal editor will decide if it’s suitable for the journal, asking questions such as: Has the author followed the journal’s guidelines? Is this the right journal for this article? • Will the journal’s readers find it interesting and useful? The editor might reject the article immediately, but otherwise it will move to the next stage, and into peer review. Step 2: First round of peer review The editor will find and contact potential referees or other researchers or academics who are experts in your field. They will be asked to read authors’ article, and advise the editor whether to publish author’s paper in that journal Step 3: Revise and resubmit Authors may then amend their article based on the reviewers’ comments, resubmitting it with any or all changes made. Authors may be asked to make further revisions or the paper may be rejected if the editor thinks that the revisions the authors have made are not adequate.